Just to follow up on my own old comment - the -ab 0 simulation on daysim is quite off, as you will get too many points in direct sun (the “sun” is larger in daysim. 2-3 closest sky patches will irradiate).
The LBT and HB[+] approaches should have a precise sun, otherwise use the ASE component to check these points.
2 Likes
rcgs
March 11, 2021, 6:08pm
23
Hello! I had some problem similar to this topic and would appreciate some feedback!
https://discourse.ladybug.tools/t/ase-and-sda-calculations-null-results/13564
Mathiassn:
Just to follow up on my own old comment - the -ab 0 simulation on daysim is quite off, as you will get too many points in direct sun (the “sun” is larger in daysim. 2-3 closest sky patches will irradiate).
The LBT and HB[+] approaches should have a precise sun, otherwise use the ASE component to check these points.
rcgs
March 11, 2021, 6:11pm
24
Hello! I am having a problem similar to this and would love some feedback!
https://discourse.ladybug.tools/t/ase-and-sda-calculations-null-results/13564
devang:
@anupamarana ,
You’ll have to use HonyebeePlus components to develop your workflow if you intend to use ASE and SDA components from Honeybee Plus. Most likely, this error occurs because you’re supplying a Honeybee object generated from Honeybee legacy version.