Point in time daylight analysis comparison HB-Radiance vs ClimateStudio

Hi @mikkel

I actually have a similar issue when I am running SDA calculation with HB-Radiance in Grasshopper and Climate Studio in Rhino.

When I run the simulation in Grasshopper with the default radiance parameters, I get SDA of 55% which is too low comparing with the results in Climate studio which give an SDA of 86.6% (which is the value we would expect to achieve). And when I change the ambient bounce to 6 (-ab 6) in Grasshopper, it gives an SDA of 100% which is again quite different from what I got in Climate Studio.

Do you know why this happens, and what could be the possible solutions to achieve a logical result in Grasshopper too?

I also uploaded the gh file with all data internalized and the xml files I used.

I would appreciate your help a lot!

SingleOffice_Fabric_Daylight_SDAproblem.gh (189.6 KB)

glz_sol_ctl.xml (826.8 KB)

Thanks a lot!
Mojdeh