Good catch! That’s a pretty compex workaround that you should not have to deal with. I just added a check here:
… so you should not have to use this workaround again.
Thanks for finding and reporting the issue.
Good catch! That’s a pretty compex workaround that you should not have to deal with. I just added a check here:
… so you should not have to use this workaround again.
Thanks for finding and reporting the issue.