I am testing different light transmittance for each glazing and running it through colibri. The results are listed below.
As you see the daylight factor does not change for the inner zone glazing. But when i run it without Colibri the value is different. Why does this happen?
There is a much greater difference in the results between the different glazings when I run the simulations separately. Does Colibri have any particular settings witch change the results when simulating several parameters?
I am not sure what you meant by “greater difference”, how big? could you show screenshots?.
I don’t think this has anything to do with Colibri.
Did you try to run the same simulation twice manually? You will get slightly difference result numbers, which is the nature of daylight simulations.
As you see the average daylightfactor varies from 1,43 % to 2,67%. While the colibri simulation only goes from 1,43667% to 1,4352% (almost static), in addition the daylightfactor decreases while the glazing transmittance value increases, wich don’t make sense, since more light is transmitted through the glass.