HB Airflow Network Infiltration Problem

Hi everyone,

I hope you can help me. When I use the HB Airflow Network Component my Infiltration rates are very wrong unfortunately.

Ninf = 0.09 ACH as supposed to reality Ninf = 0.3 ACH

I’m currently using the leakage Template VeryPoor. Anyone else encountering this problem as well and knows how to help.

My Issue:

I am simulating a Classroom in regard to natural ventilation and how it affects the adaptive comfort in Occupied Discomfort Degree Hours, there are no mechanical systems at all.

As a reference I have a research paper with specifically analysed the infiltration and ventilation rates of a exsisting classroom in south korea with the tracer gas method. So the results I have as an reference are measured in real life and not simulated. Link to paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721028357?via%3Dihub


In Table 2 the following values where measured:

For Infiltration (Base Case) Ninf = 0.3 ACH
For Ventilation (30% single sided) Nvent= 2.9 ACH


Fig. 1 Screenshot from Paper Classroom


Fig.2 Rebuilt Classroom in Grasshopper

My Simulation:
I rebuilt the classroom in grasshopper and simulated it with a Epw file from the same location suwon, south korea.

The classroom Dim : 8.2 m Length x 7.9 m Width x 2.5 m Height. Volume 162 m3

Window Size: (30 % case) in total: 1.08 m2 (4 windows sized 0,27m2 each)
Height Window Sill: 1.5 meter (exactly as in the research paper)
Orientation Windows: South
Schedule Windows: Open during occupied school hours, closed at night.
AFN Leakage Template: VeryPoor

Without AFN I set the infiltration in HB Infiltration to 0.0006 m3/s per m2 facade.

My Simulation Results: for the day 10.07 at 8 am i have a temp difference inside (Top) outside (Drybulb) of about 3 degrees.

AFN:
When using the AFN component I get following results.

Ventilation: Nvent = 3.07 ACH very close to 2.9 (im impressed)
Infiltration: Ninf = 0.09 ACH wrong (real value Ninf= 0.3)

WITHOUT AFN:
When not using the AFN just HB Window Opening + Infiltration:

Ventilation: Nvent = 5.2 ACH wrong (real value Nvent = 2,9)
Infiltration: Ninf = 0.28 ACH (very close to 0.3)

So apparently when i use the AFN component my ventilation values are right but my infiltration is wrong. And without the component the opposite.

I would really like to continue with the AFN component as it gives proper results for the ventilation.

My Question: Does anyone know how i can fix this so I get more realistic infiltration Values while using the AFN component ?

Thank you so much your help is much appreciated, currently writing a thesis at TUM at the chair of climate responsive design.

All the best,
Nick

PS: Some more results from my simulation.

you can see ACH for the 10.07, the max values for the year, and the mean of the year.




1 Like

Hey @chris

Do you perhaps have any idea or experience why that would be the case?

This may be the source of the issue because this overwrites the default calculation of infiltration crack criteria from the specified infiltration flow rates on the room. Have you tried disconnecting this and setting your infiltration flow rate higher?

Here is a table of my testing, when using the HB Infiltration the rates are still wrong when using the AFN komponent i dont know why but with the AFN the infiltration always seems to low.

My results are as follows:

With HB window Opening:
Average infiltration year = 0.28

With AFN + Template very poor
ACH inf = 0.074

With AFN + HB InF 0.0006
ACH inf = 0.017

So no matter what i try the infiltration rates are always to low.