Hi everyone!
I’m working on a glare analysis using Honeybee for a glazed pedestrian bridge in Oslo. The bridge has transparent walls and a translucent glass floor, while the roof is opaque.
I’ve created different HB Glass Modifiers to simulate various glazing types:
- Clear glass
- Silk-screened glass
- Triple Low-E glass with Argon
Each modifier has different solar and visible transmittance values, and I correctly assigned them to the bridge surfaces using HB Face
and HB Model
. However, when I run the Annual Glare Analysis with HB Annual Glare
, the final results seem to be identical across all glazing types. There’s no variation in the glare percentage or spatial distribution, even when I completely change the material properties.
I’ve double-checked:
- The modifiers are connected to the correct surfaces.
- The geometry is accurate and facing correctly.
- I’m using a proper EPW file for Oslo.
- The model runs without errors.
But still, the output stays the same.
Could it be that the HB Glass Modifier is not affecting the glare results properly? Or am I missing a step in assigning/translating the glass material for glare simulations?
Thanks in advance for your help!