LBT1.4 failed to generate thermal map

[dandashiarch]

Hi all,
I installed the latest version of LBT and tried to generate thermal map but i got this message :

1. Solution exception:The recipe failed to run with the following summary:

Scheduled 58 tasks of which:

• 48 ran successfully:
  • 3 ComputeSphericalViewFactors(…)
  • 1 CopyGridInfo(…)
  • 1 CopyRedistInfo(…)
  • 1 CreateDirectSky(…)
  • 1 CreateModelOccSchedules(…)
    …
• 1 failed:
  • 1 RunEnergySimulation(…)
• 9 were left pending, among these:
  • 9 had failed dependencies:
    • 1 LetUtciComfortMapFly(…)
    • 1 RestructureConditionIntensityResults(…)
    • 1 RestructureConditionResults(…)
    • 1 RestructureCspResults(…)
    • 1 RestructureHspResults(…)
      …

This progress looks because there were failed tasks

Use the report_out attribute of recipe settings to see a full report.

[Aliarch]

please put the gh file
i guess the problem is the sensor grids

[dandashiarch]

outfoor_comfort_under_a_tree (1).gh (111.3 KB)
thanks for your reply!

[dandashiarch]

model uploaded, I appreciate your support

[dandashiarch]

@chris can you please check my question, i really need a solution
thanks for your support .

[dandashiarch]

simulation is working now i changed the grid size from 0.5 to 1 m

now I want to generate UTCI map but the definition has only extreme hot week!

[dandashiarch]

another question please,
How to define analysis period manually ?

[Aliarch]

hi @dandashiarch
Sorry I saw the message late.
First of all, I must say that you need a minimum of training and practice in the basics of Ladybug. Because you could not tell the difference between Room and Surface in the file.
It looks like you’re going to analyze an open space. me and @chris have discussed this topic and you can follow it.
In my opinion, the use of HB UTCI Comfort Map component based on Energy Plus can not cover the open space; Because using only the surfaces and shades, the energy plus will not be involved. The solution we agreed with @chris mentioned in the same mentioned topic, was that if we wanted to use this component for open spaces, we had to allocate a room and consider all its walls as a operable window (alwayse on). Now again, if a correction is needed in my explanation, @chris please complete it.

Of course, you can simulate open space for the UTCI index according to this algorithm; Unfortunately, this workflow does not take into account the material.
all best.

[dandashiarch]

thanks for your reply , i really need to practice more .
my goal here to make outdoor comfort map for a park with trees involving in the analysis , i used what @chris posted earlier (trees in outdoor thermal comfort) but i couldn’t change the analysis period and make it manually .

[AbrahamYezioro]

Have you tried this?:

-A.

[dandashiarch]

@AbrahamYezioro thanks for your reply!
i just tries what you suggested and this is the results !

[AbrahamYezioro]

Well … it is not the same file as the one posted above.
Upload it but before check the normal direction of the analysis surface and be sure it points upwards.
-A.

[dandashiarch]

Trees_in_Outdoor_Thermal_Comfort.3dm (736.3 KB)
outfoor_comfort_under_a_tree (1).gh (77.4 KB)

[AbrahamYezioro]

There is no problem in the file. The thing is that the period you choose is overheated (Air temperature).
UTCI comfort ranges between 9 to 26 C. The AT in the period you choose is way over this range.
I picked a different period plotting the EPW AT data. In february, for your location, you can have comfort areas, like this:

And this is the working file:
outfoor_comfort_under_a_tree (1)_AY.gh (101.1 KB)

-A.

[dandashiarch]

thanks for your effort !
I’m wondering why the temperature under the trees are high

[AbrahamYezioro]

If you refer to the image i uploaded the numbers are not temperatures but TCP %.
-A.