I have an old building where I know the current thermal transmittance of the walls, based on site analysis. I want to make a thermal analysis on HB, for later second analysis based on potential improvements on the building and make a comparison.
I wonder which the best way is to apply the construction specifications of the current building. I see the only HB Window Material allows me to input the U-factor. But I’m not sure it that will bring odd results during the calculation. Also, I don’t have the solar heat gain coefficient of the current wall construction.
That’s not exactly what I’m looking for. The component you mention is for creating a new material, where I would need to input the thermal conductivity of the material (w/mK), and later the construction component, I guess, will calculate the U-Factor including the indoor and outdoor air layers resistance.
But I already have the U-Factor (W/m2K) based on site testing. I saw on the “HB Window Material (WindowMat)” I can input directly the U-Factor I have. But I don’t have clear how this component would perform for the task I’m looking for.
Or if there is a better alternative for simulation of existing buildings, as current performance of a 20 yo building it’s not the same as calculated on EP with the same materials/constructions. Introducing on-site collected data will improve the simulation result.
Hi @Barbarur,
As far as I know there is no standard tool for this in Honeybee. But with deconstruct construction you can check the output and look what the calculted U factor will be.
FYI the reason that the u-factor isn’t exposed as an input is because the outside and inside air film resistances for EnergyPlus constructions are calculated during the simulation to better account for the evolution of radiant and convective heat transfer[1]. So your simulation will be more accurate if you could derive the existing building u-value (which, understandably, is difficult).