Hi @chris ,
Sorry to bring you back to this topic. I was just comparing these 2 workflows in my model (Rhino 8), but the results are very different between each other. It makes sense in rooms like a greenhouse, but it doesn’t make sense to have so different percentages in rooms like a garage or a bathroom where the sun doesn’t fall onto the occupant. Do you have any clue? As it makes me doubt what’s the simulation that is closer to reality.
I realized about the following: for the 1st workflow, the outputs of LB Comfort Statistics say “the percent of time…”, while for the 2nd workflow, the outputs of HB Adaptive Comfort Map say “the percentage of occupied time…”. I tried using an HB Program Type and assigning 100% occupancy time to the Garage, and while the results change more for the 2nd workflow, the difference between both workflows remains very big.
Thank you so much in advance!