Hi @chris,
We are getting closer, i think. You are convincing me … and i want to propose something.
- What we agree on: This is fine.
- What we need a consensus:
I believe we can agree that the former is the right one. This is the accepted approach so we don’t need to challenge that at this point.
I see your point and i’m for keeping consistency.
I would say that it is a combination. I’ll try to explain after the next quote.
You are right on this BUT you are denying the possible use of ventilation. When you check winter time in the chart, the cooling options are off. What you suggest is provide shading as an option, which is fine, but not the only option i can apply. I’m trying to think what i would do in the case that in mid january i get lots of sun in the space i am in. Open a window or close the shades? Myself will probably open the window.
Exactly. So here is what i propose, based on what i just found in the Lechner’s book (Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects):
The key part is
… to the right of the vertical shade line, the sun should be prevented from entering windows
So maybe this should be the approach: the shade line is not a strategy but rather a recommendation. The counting of the hours that fall to the right of it (not counting the comfort polygon ones) represent the potential severity of the situation (i know you don’t like the potential word in this context … ) and not a strategy by itself.
This can be a good option, you can explain that to people and makes sense.
Saying that, what do you think about the quote of the book. Right now i can live with either of the options.
Thanks @chris. I see the intellectual effort you are putting here and the responsibility you feel towards this. This is great!! I appreciate it very much.
-A.